Chile: Bombs Case trial update (January 2 to 13)

| 0 comments

“The mass of uniformed witnesses, judicial officials, analysts who have paraded through the tribunal speak of the scary, frightening, dreaded, terrorizing, evil “anarcho-insurrectionalism” as one might speak of satanism, needless to say that none can speak specifically or definite it beyond a simple and stupid “they are those who want to destroy the State” even though within this characterization they are able to include literally whatever they want.”
_________________________________________________________________________________

from solidaridadporlxspresxs, translated by war on society:

*Attack on car dealership Atal, March 27, 2007

Police officers and witnesses who heard the noise finished testifying about the explosion in this attack. In which a couple of windows were broken and a car sustained minor damages which were repaired and the car sold.

*Attack on Chilectra, October 16, 2007

Unknown persons left an explosive device during the early hours, supposedly TNT activated by a fuse, broke windows of the Chilectra branch located on Gran Av. in La Cisterna. Near the branch leaflets were found making allusion to environmental issues and fee increases. Witnesses and owners of nearby premises testified who had learned of the explosion the following day observing the damages to the branch, as well as police in charge of the proceedings.

* ON TERROR: Interrogatories and questions from the prosecution

The prosecution is crude in its interrogatories, seeking to prove terror at any cost in order to thus justify the application of the anti-terrorist law. They insist with questions like: Were you scared? Did you feel panic? Did you think the worst? Is it normal for this to occur? The witnesses are people who live close the places of explosion or who heard of the explosions even by the press or telephone calls of neighbors altering them of the incident and many times surprised by the operations and mobilizations of the police.

These kinds of questions are also put to the police who go to the locations afterwards, asking them grossly: Where you nervious? Did you wonder what would happen? Had this happened before in your police career? Did it call your attention? When your arrived at home, did you comment on it to your family? And thus an endless number of questions directed to the uniforms. In their interrogations the persecutors show that the prosecution itself is the only one who seeks to instill indiscriminate terror in everyone who so much as knew of the explosion.

*Statement and collaboration of the insect: the “intelligence” testify again.

On December 31, 2008, Gustavo Fuentes Aliaga, el grillo, stabbed his partner until believing her dead, then the insect collaborated and invented with the police letting himself be led by the imagination of the police and prosecutors to elaborate a statement with names and dates linking them with explosive attacks, among them himself and his recently attacked partner.

Personel from DIPOLCAR, carabineros intelligence, were presented as witnesses in the trial narrating how the arrest and subsequent statement of the insect went, making it clear and even written that the deliriums of el grillo were guided by prosecutors and police, where coincidentally the only device that he describes precisely is the device deactivated by GOPE at State Defense Council. The insect gives names and lets his imagination take off, collaborating with the police and indicating various persons, with this quantity of names the police conduct telephone taps, surveillance and raids to have Candelaria and Francisco charged, accused almost exclusively on the basis of the statements of this subject.

The statement is taken with an endless number of irregularities in form, without defense council, without date nor hour of beginning and end, making a statement about a case when he was arrested for another and so on and so forth. The bourgeois press has leaked on innumerable occasions excerpts from the statement (Spanish link; it’s worth mentioning that he is never presented as a witness but rather as a confessed actor) seeking to show some certainty and truth in the whole investigation.

The DIPOLCAR police appear again and testify in the trial, they carried out the surveillance, phone taps, monitoring marches because again for them there are apparent links between free expression, conspiratory centers, the struggle in the streets as an irrefutable element of participation in explosive attacks and thus the endless amount of illogical connections proper to the intelligence forces.

The true illicit terrorist association….

During the trial and in releases in which the press has transcended its time it has been made clear and apparent that in order to carry out the investigation they decided to create a multi-disciplinary team composed by different police forces of different sections in order to investigate the so-called “bombs case”from the carabineros to the PDI (Investigative Police) having to forget their historical differences and disputes between egos. It is thus that personal from different areas, in great part from the specialized departments, forms a group that, under the guise of looking for the authors of the explosive attacks, dedicated themselves to survey, monitor, listen in on, follow, and raid the entire wide spectrum of subjects who from whatever perspective show their critique of power: MIRists, shanty-dwellers’ organizations, prisoners with subversive history, squatters, anarchists, former Lautarinos, leftists, relatives, friends, neighbors, sporadic visitors to anti-authoritarian libraries, participants in marches, etc.

The formation of a multi-disciplinary team on the part of the police would come to be the “anti-terrorist brigade” of other countries. This team was commanded by the different prosecutors who led the investigation in their own times.

What the police intelligence say

The mass of uniformed witnesses, judicial officials, analysts who have paraded through the tribunal speak of the scary, frightening, dreaded, terrorizing, evil “anarcho-insurrectionalism” as one might speak of satanism, needless to say that none can speak specifically or definite it beyond a simple and stupid “they are those who want to destroy the State” even though within this characterization they are able to include literally whatever they want. These police read posters like they would read horror stories, in addition to having the gift of linking whatever discussion, nickname, graffiti, pamphlet, publication, poster, public activity, forum, march, conversation, phrase, word with some explosive device. Again the blatant political character of the trial that the comrades face is made manifest.

ABSOLUTION OF THE 5 COMRADES ON TRIAL FOR THE “BOMBS CASE”!

END TO THE POLITICAL TRIAL!

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *.