NEGAZIONE DEL DIRITTO ANTIGIURIDISMO:
STATEMENT BY CONSPIRACY OF CELLS OF FIRE FAI FRI
Before I speak my mind about the legal objections raised from the side of the lawyers, I want to make something clear. In this trial, there are four different sides. The side of the judges, the lawyers’ side, the side of the accused,who are innocent and our own side, the side of those who took responsibility for our action in the network of the Conspiracy of Cells of Fire.
From the part of lawyers there was a refined positioning in relation to the submission of objections to the court,in previous sessions. The lawyers, among whom is also our personal friend FranciscosRagkousis, speaking in the language of the law, not only highlighted the contradictions of the trial but they also showed its hypocrisy
We’re talking about a show that does not even keep up the pretenses of its own democratic scenario. But this farce called trial, leaves us completely indifferent. Often our attorneys appointed by the court, reach a dead end. As they say themselves, the hostile and absolute wayin which we face this trial, blocks them and cancels pieces of legal defense. It cancels the possible presumption of innocence, the pleas and defense lines as well as the legal benefit of any extenuations.
To be accurate, your laws are trash for us. Our view on justice is written on the demolishof the courts of Thessaloniki, on the blasting of the façade of Athens’ Court,on the homes of judges, that we burned … Nothing has changed just because some of us were captured. The captivity in prison did not reduce, our decision to fight against laws and institutions, evenone inch.
Then one could reasonably wonder why we appear at trial. The answer is simple. When we were free/wantedour attacks were the way we expressed ourselves and now as we remain captured, our word, even in the court of the enemy, breaks the silence. Silence is not acceptable for an anarchist urban guerrilla.
This does not mean that we will resort to the legal corpses of words in order to talk about ourselves. Reference was made to the jurisdiction of the Court. For us, the court lacks jurisdiction. We do not recognize any white-collar as our natural judge. Only we and our conscience can judge our actions. Nobody else.There was also a plea for the poor composition of judges. But for us, there are not good and bad judges, nor righteous and unrighteous. There are simply judges, officials of the enemy in different shades whose names are targets ofthe anarchist network of CCF, without exceptions.
The issue of the Joint Statutory and the presence of jurors, was also mentioned. We make clear here that we are anarcho-individualists and nihilists and that we have no appreciation nor respect for the “poor people.” Even more, for law-abiding citizens who sit on the benches of jurors. This “poor” people, who is today humiliated and miserable,are the same whoworships their bosses and have the same values with them, money and power. They are the people who always whimper but never revolt, questioning but always believe in young leaders/saviors, who always yell but never act. It is high time we break away from dusty revolutionary ideologies· no sheep was saved bleating. Against sheep and shepherds, we are wolves.
As far as the definition of “political crime” is concerned, we don’t seek evaluation for our action within the laws and the articles of the penal code. Our actions are defined by ourselves with the way we intervene into the normal course of history in order to derail it. Only through violent derailment of history, is a person able to come across the peaks of his thoughts and actions. We place ourselves far away from the so-called unselfish separation between political and criminal. These terms belong to Power and we don’t use them.
There is just the responsibility of saying “this is me and I will continue to wage war by all means necessary”. Theory and action are one. This is the theory of the Conspiracy of Cells of Fire.The unity of theory and action, for the destruction of the system.As for the unselfishness of the motives of our actions, this just a romantic abstraction, unable to measure up with real life.Anarchy is our egoistic demand to ourselves, to take life in our own hands. To define our existence. To hit what is ugly. More than anything it is an existential bet and not a scheme for social salvation. So we are nor unselfish neither do we act in the name of the pitiful people. We are egoist anarchists and we don’t accept extenuations. We have already chosen the weight of our choices and we are not going to lighten our decisions.
As far as the potential risk of human life is concerned, we have said these things before in other trials. The choices of each one of us, define his life. There are options that are hostile and their exponents are targets for us. The acts and thoughts of an anarchist urban guerrilla aim to multiply the risk to the life of the enemies of anarchy and of state officials. It is clear that the Conspiracy of Cells of Fire contributed to the proliferation of this risk and we will continue to do so.
For all these reasons and countless more, do not bother to answer the objections because we are indifferent to them. We reject the hypocrisy of a democratic dialogue and choose to keep our words armed, as our weapons. Always on the opposite side, always on the attack.
The imprisoned comrades of the Conspiracy of Cells of Fire FAI/IRF