At the end of 2014, as in info of Red Aid Switzerland, the federal tribunal rejected an appeal against the rejection by the DAP of Zurich of a request for release on bail presented a year earlier.
However the DAP proposed the beginning of a process of “rehabilitation”, that is to say an “easing” (“concessions” such as permits, semi-open prison, etc.) of the sentence for “rehabilitation” aimed at “reducing the danger of becoming a repeat offender” after the end of the sentence (May 2018).
The defence lawyer demanded that the DAP “responsible for (my) case” expressthemselves on the outcome (or not) of the request (the same for the two prisons ofLenzburg and Bostadel). The person responsible stated that it should proceed well in this sense, but not before receiving (non-binding) “clarifications” from the DAP psychological-forensic department within ROS-Abklärung procedures.
ROS stands for Risikoorientierter Strafvollzug, i.e. “risk-orientated sanctions enforcement” while Abklärung stands for “clarification”, “elucidation”. Abklärung is an “enhanced” (according to the “three eyes principle”) procedure of control and evaluation exercised by the DAP with respect to “concessions” and release of “dangerous clients” introduced first by the Canton of Zurich and then imitated by another three cantons.
At the end of April 2015 (almost Olympic timing…) this “clarification” (whose copies in German are being issued) came in no less than 24 pages!, along with the announcement that “The consequent actual planning of the enforcement will becommunicated in mid-May 2015)”. As for this “actual planning”, a (legal) “hearing” with the “client”, i.e. myself, is very likely to occur soon. So, “relying on court papers”, a female forensic psychologist expert produced the“scientific” standardized Risk-Assessment mountain with obscenities, just togive an idea, such as 1) PCL-R (Psychopathy Checklist-Revised; Hare, 2003), 2)VRAG (Violence Risk Appraisal Guide; Harris et al., 1993) and 3) Fotres(Urbaniok, 2006).
Fotres is a digital pseudo-scientific catalogue consisting of thousands of boxes to be ticked in order to “assess” (Heil Lombroso…!!! et al) things such as “ social dangerousness” and the “risk of becoming a repeat offender”. A catalogue elaborated, applied and passed off (with “colateral” millionaire income!) at international level by the German forensic psychiatrist Urbaniok and his gang, of the psychological-psychiatric department of DAP Zurich, of which he is the leader.